Golden Living Designated as a Special Focus Facility
Lancaster ratings reveal that while some facilities have improved their standings, Golden Living is now one star and has been found to have a history of poor care. To read more, click here.
Lancaster ratings reveal that while some facilities have improved their standings, Golden Living is now one star and has been found to have a history of poor care. To read more, click here.
Claiming that it was corporate policy, an assisted living facility refused to provide medical care that might have saved a woman’s life. This is an example of corporate disinterest in the safety and welfare of the elderly. To read more, click here.
Though we’ve always known that poor staffing leads to falls and pressure ulcers, new research shows that Norovirus is also causally linked to poorly staffed nursing homes. The Journal for the American Medical Association recently published these findings and they are summarized in an article by Dr. Jeffry Levine.
One of the most common mental conditions we see with nursing home residents is Alzheimer’s disease. It can be very difficult for a family to watch a family member slowly slipping away mentally. This condition can also increase someone’s risk for falls and other injuries.
The government today announced that a new plan is being launched with “the goal of finding effective ways to prevent and treat the devastating effects of dementia by 2025.” New studies are being conducted to learn to treat and prevent the illness, as well as optimizing care quality and expand support to families.
You can read the entire article online here.
Families for Better Care – a citizen’s advocacy organization – showed in a recent study that the largest publicly traded nursing home chains remained very profitable despite Medicare payment cuts last year. The director of Families for Better Care, Brian Lee, believes that the profits are driven by lower nursing hours and less care based on a study conducted last fall.
‘“The reason care declines in nursing homes is that executives unnecessarily target labor costs to offset any reimbursement adjustments,” Lee said. “While this obviously maintains a robust bottom line for investors and cushy CEO salaries, the decline in frontline staff puts residents in jeopardy for harm while simultaneously creating dangerous working conditions for employees.”’
A new study conducted by Center For Medicare Advocacy (CMA) concludes that while “some for-profit nursing facilities give excellent care and some not-for-profit nursing facilities give poor care – the general rule is documented in study after study: not-for-profit nursing facilities generally provide better care to their residents.”
While each nursing home is truly different, knowing the facts before choosing a facility is key.
You can read the full study results online here.
I just happened upon an excellent website (http://www.neverevents.org/), promoting the value of 11 years of “Never Events” as establishing safer practices in our hospitals. This site is authored by a physician and notes that another physician, Ken Kizer, MD, former CEO of the non-profit, National Quality Forum (NQF), first introduced this term in 2001.
Since then, insurance companies, health organizations and later, the U.S. government, came on board – to support the notion that failing to protect the consumer public from preventable errors has devastating consequences for this nation. Topping the list on this site are preventable pressure ulcers.
Recently, I had the opportunity to review a long term care insurance policy. The document was confusing and full of exceptions. It was difficult for me to believe that the people who bought the policy could understand what it said.
Even worse is when a person who has paid for a long term care insurance policy is having difficulty getting the benefits. That is what some plaintiffs in California are alleging – that the company’s claims process is "designed to frustrate and confuse policyholders with needless demands for irrelevant information.”
While long term care insurance can be terrific protection for a family’s assets if long term care or home care is needed, not all policies or insurance companies are the same. It certainly can’t hurt to have someone familiar with insurance products review a policy before purchase. Many certified financial planners can review policies, or can assist in purchasing a policy best for the individual. Researching companies before buying the products is also a good idea.
Insurance is only good if it works when you most need it!
A new study confirms that a large percentage of nursing home residents are prescribed anti-depressants, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). While in most cases, anti-depressants are beneficial to the well being of the residents, in patients suffering from dementia, they can significantly increase the risk of falls - leading to serious injuries, and even death.
Researchers from the Netherlands recently reported that a study, which included 248 nursing homes, shows that anti-depressants were used on over 13,000 patients of which more than 650 sustained injuries. These falls occurred in 152 out of the 248 nursing homes included in the study. Additionally, 38 residents fell once during the time of the study, while 114 had multiple falls. Of those 650 falls, 220 resulted in serious injury, or even death.
It is imperative that these facilities conduct interdisciplinary care meetings to ensure that the proper protocols are followed, in order to reduce the risk of life-threatening accidents.
While nursing homes should always look to prevent bed sores – a painful and sometimes deadly condition – a recent study conducted revealed that the prevention of bed sores is also cost effective.
Foam mattresses which reduce pressure were found to be cost-effective 82% of the time as opposed to using standard mattresses. This simple change could save on average $115 per resident. Additionally, foam cleansers for incontinence were found to be cost-effective 94% of the time, as opposed to traditional soap and water, which results in an average savings of $179 per resident.
On average, roughly 10% of residents in long-term care facilities have a pressure ulcer. And for those residents, treatments are critical early on in order to prevent a serious, and even life-threatening condition. A better solution to this problem is prevention. Nursing homes and assisted living facilities can, and should, prevent these problems from happening rather than treating them after the fact. Most importantly, not only are these prevention techniques the right thing to do, but they also save money for the facility!
A recent article in the Star Ledger, Stronger safeguards needed in N.J. hospitals, nursing homes, asks the questions, “Should corporate lobbyists decide whether safe equipment and procedures are needed if you or a loved one have to go to a hospital or nursing home? Or should health care professionals make those decisions?”
All too often high power corporate interests utilize lobbyists to cut corners, increase profits and put patients at tremendous risk. In this recent article, we see how this plays out in ways that not only harm nursing home residents and hospital patients, but also places healthcare workers at risk.
I have had cases where a person suffers from a bed sore that is so large the spinal column is visible, and yet the cause of death listed on the death certificate states, “natural causes”, or “dementia”, or “Alzheimer’s”. While we may still pursue a claim to hold those responsible for the large and painful wound accountable, it is frustrating to the family that the bed sore is not listed on the death certificate.
We are currently prosecuting cases where had a resident not been taken to the hospital and died in the nursing home, the true cause of death would have never been discovered.
Unfortunately, this situation is far from unusual. As reported in ProPublica, suspicious elder deaths are rarely investigated. According to the article, autopsies performed on seniors are increasingly rare even though the United States population aged 65 and older has grown. From 1972-2007, the number of autopsies performed on seniors dropped from 37% to just 17% percent. Additionally, of the 1.8 million seniors who died in 2008, autopsies were performed on only 2%, and only performed on 1% for those elderly who passed away in nursing homes or care facilities.
With the passing of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), this nation has seen the beginning of a dramatic shift in both the delivery of healthcare and the means by which payment is made for medical services. Under the ACA, a new type of medical agency was created, known as Accountable Care Organizations (ACO). These entities are required to coordinate all levels of care in a fashion that is both more efficient and better focused on the provision of quality care.
As we have written on our blog, hospitals will no longer be paid to rectify medical errors which have been deemed as “never events.” This is a class of medical error which non-profit research groups and the federal government alike have determined to be wholly unacceptable in the hospital context. ACO’s are being organized to help prevent the occurrence of never events.
At present, we may be at a crossroads in terms of whether ACO’s will be lead by physicians or hospitals. Either scenario has its share of opportunities and pitfalls. The New England Journal of Medicine has been following ACO issues and includes some excellent commentary.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have recently designated certain injuries in hospitals “never events” – or injuries that should not happen. These injuries include Stage III and IV bed sores and falls with fractures. The penalty to hospitals when these injuries happen is that CMS will not pay for treatment rendered for these injuries. The result is that many hospitals are reporting the incidence of these events has gone down, and in some places tremendously.
Now, the Obama administration is doing a similar thing to nursing homes according to an article in Forbes magazine.
According to the article, a recent study showed that 25% of nursing home hospital admissions may be preventable. A further congressional review panel estimates that 14% of hospital patients sent back to nursing homes return to a hospital for a preventable condition. The Obama administration wants to penalize nursing homes that have unnecessarily high hospital admissions for preventable conditions by reducing their Medicare payments.
So, why are these residents being sent to the hospital to be paid for with your tax money? The author of the article documents that, “I’ve seen hospital emergency rooms filled with very frail seniors on Friday afternoons. Why? Because nursing homes know they won’t have enough weekend staff to care for their sickest residents, so they simply send them back to the hospital. The new rules could stop those practices.”
Perhaps hitting substandard nursing homes in the pocketbook will force them to take better care of their residents.
A recent article in The Bergen Record, New Jersey ranks poorly on long-term nursing care, discusses the fact that New Jersey nursing-home care is less affordable and patients are more likely to suffer bedsores or need trips to the hospital than in many other states. New Jersey ranked in the second tier of states — 22nd — for choice, affordability, quality of care and support for family members who take care of the elderly and disabled at home.
I recently wrote a post on my firm’s Facebook page discussing the implications this article, and these new findings, could have on the health care industry in New Jersey.
Recently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) made certain information regarding safety issues in hospitals public information. Data tracking “hospital acquired conditions” - injuries/conditions a patient suffers that they did not enter the hospital with - are now available to the public. They are serious conditions that if proper procedures are less likely to occur. They have been deemed “never events” and CMS does not pay for services related to these injuries. The injuries include:
You can download the most recent results online here. Now, you can now know your area hospitals before you become a patient in regards to these serious conditions.
Currently pending in congress is bill HR5 sponsored by Representative Phil Gingrey. If HR5 passes, it would protect some of the worst nursing homes from even the most egregious abuses by severely limiting damages.
If this law passes, even a nursing home where a resident was admittedly beaten to death or raped by a known dangerous employee, damages are capped despite what a jury believes is the right thing to do.
Interestingly, when it comes to his own lawsuits, Representative Gingrey seems to have a different point of view.
A recent article by Public Citizen writes that after a 2004 rear-end car accident, Representative Gingrey sued the other driver and sought damages for “mental pain” and punitive damages to be determined by “the enlightened conscience of fair and impartial jurors.” He claimed he “was injured grievously, has experienced conscious physical and mental pain, suffering, fright and distress in the past, and will continue to suffer the same in the future, for which he is entitled to recover general damages … in amounts to be determined by a jury.”
A Gingrey constituent, who had both her arms amputated as a result of medical errors after her car accident, wrote him a letter asking him to reconsider his bill.
It seems hypocritical that for his car accident, Mr. Gingrey should have the right to a full and fair jury award, but a person who is seriously injured or killed in a nursing home is restricted.
By now, most of us have heard of the tearful testimony of the great Mickey Rooney in Congress, on abuse and victimization of the elderly. Here is yet another story on how abuse of nursing home residents is not only physical, but often financial. In this case, Tanya Fredrick, the business office manager at Golden Living Center, was fired after police revealed that she had been stealing thousands of dollars from the center and residents.
With painfully shocking testimony, American Icon, Mickey Rooney, told a gripping story about how even he was the victim of elder abuse. It has become quite clear that the degree of this form of elder abuse is much more widespread than previously thought. We all need to be on the lookout for this abuse in our loved ones.
We have blogged before on the dangers of proposed HR 5 legislation, which in large part is designed to eliminate elder abuse claims. Should this bill pass, our ability to prosecute such cases, uncover these horrors and protect the elderly will be severely limited.
Here is a link to the video of Mr. Rooney's testimony. It is worth watching.
A disturbing recent story was released and ultimately televised involving an over-stressed nursing home employee who was caught on tape assaulting an innocent resident. No matter how difficult the job, harming an innocent senior is vicious and wholly worthy of the prosecution that this employee faces. It is imperative that nursing home owners carefully screen and supervise employees to prevent the needless harms that inevitably will ensue.
A recent study of nursing home risk factors conducted by the American College of Preventive Medicine shows that washing hands with soap and water is far more effective in preventing norovirus - a virus common in nursing homes characterized by vomiting and diarrhea - than using alcohol based solutions found in dispensers throughout most nursing homes and hospitals.
However, what was also interesting in this study was the identification of another risk factor - low and part-time staffing. The study found that other risk factors with high risk ratios were the use of part-time staff when the proportion of staff-to-patients was less than 1:2, and when the total staff-to-patient ratio was less than the industry median.
You can find how nursing homes are rated in regards to staffing on the Medicare’s Nursing Home Compare website. Nursing Home Compare rates staffing, like other measures, on a one to five star scale.
Many of our cases involve terrible injuries and death as a result of neglect, negligence and abuse, such as bed sores, hip fractures and assaults. However, many of our clients and their families also complain about living in nursing homes that are just bad - a lousy building, freezing in the winter, hot in the summer, residents not being changed and bathed, broken plumbing, roaches and rodents, uncaring staff, or not enough nurses or CNAs. After receiving complaints, the nursing home promises to fix these problems and don’t. What can someone do in these circumstances?
Know your rights.
New Jersey, like many other states, gives nursing home residents specific rights by law. If nursing homes infringe these rights they can be punished. Resident rights must be in writing, posted, and given to each nursing home resident when admitted. These are important rights, and include the right to:
Make sure you have a copy of the law. You can view the full text online. If the nursing home is not meeting these rights, demand that they start doing what the law requires.
A government study released today states that roughly 15,000 Medicare patients die each month due in part to the care they receive at hospitals. The study focuses on understanding adverse events in hospitals, or more specifically, any medical care that causes harm to a patient.
The study included 780 Medicare patients who were discharged from a hospital in October 2008. Those patients suffered from problems such as bed sores, infections and excessive bleeding from blood-thinning drugs. Of the 780 patients in the study, 12 died as a result of hospital care, five of which were related to blood-thinning medication. Additionally, two other medication-related deaths involved inadequate insulin management resulting in hypoglycemic coma and respiratory failure resulting from over-sedation.
This is simply devastating and completely unacceptable for the roughly 47 million Americans enrolled in Medicare across the country.
Bed sores (also called pressure ulcers and decubitus ulcers) can develop into severe wounds that can be fatal. Wounds can at times be so large that bones become exposed inviting infection. It is not uncommon for a family member not to see the bed sore until it is serious.
While most people have heard the term bed sore before, very few have actual experience with them. They are fortunate. One person recently told me they thought a bed sore was akin to a bad rash, until she first saw one on her mom and almost passed out.
A bed sore forms when a person is not moved. Areas with constant pressure on the underlying tissue such as the tail bone (also called the sacral area), elbows, heels and head, and areas where there is a brace, prevent blood flow that can kill tissue. This causes a bed sore.
Bed sores are categorized by Stages. Basically they are 5 stages of bed sores or pressure ulcers:
Stage I - No skin breakage. May look like a red rash.
Stage II - Superficial skin breakage.
Stage III - Open skin wound. Can see blood but no muscle or bone.
Stage IV - Open skin wound. Can see muscle or bone.
Unstageable - Because of dead tissue covering the wound, these wounds cannot be staged. Generally presumed to be a stage IV.
For more detailed descriptions, you can go to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's website.
The good news about bed sores is that they are both preventable and treatable. With good prevention measures and early intervention bed sores can be avoided or can heal. Even people who suffer from large bed sores may heal with the right care. Treatments vary for the different stages, so its important to understand the different stages when taking part in a care conference or talking to a doctor. Armed with the proper facts, a person can become a better advocate for a loved one.
Here's a great health care industry article that says the same thing that we've been saying on this blog for years: Spending more time and money on improving the care for our nation's most vulnerable citizens is not only the right thing to do, but will actually save taxpayers money. This report from the Kaiser Family Foundation confirms that these type of improvements to long term care can save taxpayers BILLIONS of dollars each year.
I have noted on this blog, as of today, some large nursing home conglomerates increase their profits by under staffing and underfunding nursing homes. Who pays the price? Patients who suffer and the taxpayers. The fallout of underfunded nursing homes is human suffering and taxpayers footing the bills for hospitalizations when unthinkable injuries occur.
I recently wrote an article for the New Jersey Law Journal about the new Medicare Guidelines for Hospitals and Never Events. After some additional research, I have learned that many insurance companies agree that it is unfair for negligent hospitals to pass costs related to their mistakes along to others.
We first learned that after extensive studies by non-profit health related organizations, one of the best ways to improve the quality of care for patients was to prevent hospitals from passing the costs of their mistakes on to taxpayers. So, Medicare now will not pay for treatment related to what are now called Never Events (injuries and mistakes which are never acceptable).
It seems that insurance companies agree....and many are joining in to follow Medicare's lead. As this article from a leading insurance website notes:
Standing in the middle of Never Event messes are health insurance companies. Just like Medicare, they’re tired of paying for Never Events and they want hospitals and doctors to be more accountable for their mistakes.
The Milwuakee Wisconsin Journal Sentinel reported this disturbing story. A woman died after bleeding to death when her emergency pull cord located in her “independent living” apartment went unanswered for four hours. Apparently the nurse aide who was working at the time shut off the sound alarm, disregarded a phone call from another resident who heard the alarm, and went back to watching television while the woman was bleeding to death.
What is also remarkable about this story is that the woman lived in what was deemed an “independent living” building. The same facility also included assisted living units and a nursing home. The state Department of Health Services was asked if they were getting involved in the case. Unfortunately, that agency does not oversee “independent living” apartments. Since the District Attorney did not find any crime they could prosecute, it appears that the only one who can punish this facility is the family suing.
Just because a doctor orders something for a resident in a nursing home, it does not mean it gets done - sometimes with lethal consequences. A California state investigator found that Pilgrim Haven Health Facility in Los Altos failed to install an electronic fall monitor as ordered by the resident's doctor, and failed to make sure the resident’s walker was in reach. As a result, the man fell twice, and died from head trauma. The nursing home was fined $100,000 by the state.
You can read more on the story online here.
While resident abuse is shocking and disgraceful, there are times where behavior is simply unbelievable. Six employees were recently arrested at a facility where residents with dementia were covered from head to toe in ointment cream to make them slippery for the next shift as a practical joke.
It should be noted that when the elderly are dropped they can suffer fractured hips. A fractured hip leads to disability and severe pain, and has a high mortality rate. The mortality rate is especially high in the first months after a fractured hip, and remains high for the first year.
You can read more on this story online here.
David R. Cohen, Chair of Stark & Stark's Nursing Home Litigation Group, authored the article, Decubitus Ulcers: An Update on Staging and The Impact of Never Events on Hospital Litigation, for the June 21, 2010 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal.
The article features an update on the process of diagnosising and staging decubitus ulcers, as well as guidelines for proper care and prevention. The article also includes a discussion on the applicability of so-called “never events” and what effect they can have in litigation matters.
You can read the full article online here. (PDF)
A recent Attorney General’s investigation using hidden cameras lead to the arrest of 22 nursing home health care workers for resident abuse and neglect. Examples included not turning and repositioning an immobile resident for an entire shift, not administering medications, not treating a bed sore, and not changing resident undergarments for long periods of time. Prior investigations by the Attorney General have so far lead to 30 criminal convictions, including a corporate nursing home owner.
In this video, David Cohen, Chair of Stark & Stark's Nursing Home Litigation Group, discusses the benefits of assisted living facilities. Mr. Cohen states that assisted living facilities are a great alternative to traditional nursing homes for people who need assistance, but do not require the level of care offered by a nursing home. Mr. Cohen does warn the families of assisted living facility residents to stay in constant contact with their family member or loved one in order to ensure that they are receiving the appropriate level of care.
Nursing Home Litigation - Part 1 from Stark & Stark on Vimeo.
Leaders from Democracy for America, Blue Wave NJ and the Anakbayan Filipino Youth Group and other community groups collected over 3,600 signatures for a petition which was sent to the administrators of four area nursing homes in support of workers who have been in contract negotiations for nearly three years.
More than 300 workers at three Hudson County facilities - Harbor View Health Care Center in Jersey City, Castle Hill Health Care Center in Union City, and Palisade Nursing Home in Guttenberg - plus a fourth in Bergen County, have been without a contract since July 2007.
The workers went on strike in August for three days, held several days of protests in October, and have run an extensive campaign of television, radio and billboard ads against Avery Eisenreich and Mendel Gold, top executives at the Jersey City-based Omni Health System, which owns the facilities. You can read more on this story online here.
Nursing home care is proving to be a growing priority. After being faced with alarming delays in investigating nursing home complaints, the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services avows to speed up scrutiny to ensure safety and avoid resident harm. Read more on this story online here.
Dave Cohen, Chair of Stark & Stark's Nursing Home Litigation Group, authored the article, Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities: Understanding the Differences and Keeping Your Loved Ones Safe, for the January 20, 2010 edition of US 1 Newspaper. You can read the full article below:
As a trial attorney for over twenty years and a litigator who has devoted his entire career to protecting the rights and safety of the elderly, I have seen a disturbing trend in recent years in the interplay of nursing homes and assisted living facilities. As many are aware, when our loved ones’ health declines, families are faced with critical and emotionally heart wrenching choices.
Traditionally, nursing homes have been the most common choice in working toward obtaining the highest quality of life and safety for seniors who can no longer care for themselves and for whom family members simply do not have the qualifications to fulfill these needs. More recently, assisted living facilities (ALFs) have been gaining popularity. They fulfill a well needed void in the healthcare continuum and are certainly a welcomed addition to the options available to families.
However,Assisted living facilities are regulated, but not nearly as much as nursing homes. The facilities themselves are generally much more attractive and family members tend to feel better about placing parents or spouses in them. However, ALFs generally have fewer nurses and fewer nurses’ aides. Additionally, they frequently do not have registered nurses on site for significant periods of time. For seniors with lesser needs and who are otherwise much more independent, this is an excellent environment. However, the danger is twofold:
In the first instance, while the majority of ALFs are owned and operated by caring, professional and qualified individuals, many are so focused on filling beds that they often will admit those who simply are an improper fit for that level of care. In my practice, I have seen far too many residents suffer from malnutrition, dehydration, bedsores, fractures and ultimately death based upon a poor fit for a facility which never could or should have let this person through their doors. The second danger faced by families involves situations where the fit was initially appropriate, but when the resident’s health declines, it becomes dangerous to allow that person not to receive a higher level of care. Much like poor admission situations, in my practice I have seen many residents needlessly suffer and die because the tough decision to move them into a higher level of care was overlooked by the staff at the ALF.
In the end, the decision to accept or reject the resident should be based upon the individual’s needs and not by profit. This is the formula by which the vast majority of assisted living facilities operate. It is those who do not operate in this fashion who create the dangers we speak of. Families can and should be vigilant about all of these issues. They should also conduct a significant amount of research into what the particular assisted living facility they are looking into can and cannot do.
Unfortunately, there is not a bright-line rule as to the level of care that assisted living facilities provide. I have seen an incredibly wide variance between the lower levels of care and the higher levels of care. At the lower end, there is very little supervision and medical/nursing staff available, while the higher end of care at some of these facilities is nearly indistinguishable from that provided in nursing homes. Without a clear knowledge as to what these facilities can provide, families are ill advised to take the leap into admitting a loved one. Every bit as important is monitoring the health and cognitive status of your loved one while living in an assisted living facility to ensure that they remain an appropriate fit.
With vigilance, attention and research, families can and should look toward assisted living facilities to provide the best of care and quality of life for their loved ones - but must do so with caution and their eyes open.
An article out of Minneapolis, Minnesota last week reports of an 89-year old nursing home resident who, even with all of the proper precautions, died after a fatal fall. Despite a bed alarm, a motion sensor, a sound monitor and a perimeter mattress the resident fell in the middle of the night. Due to a severely understaffed wing, the resident died due to complications from the fall.
The decision to trust a nursing home to care for a loved one can be a difficult one, even when a family does not have the time or resources to properly care for a elderly family member at home. Conflict between family members and nursing home staff is very common, especially when a family feels their loved one is not being taken care of properly. In this article, there is some great advice on what you can do when you feel your loved one is not being properly cared for.
Here is an interesting article which addresses the fact that more than 100 Minnesotans die each year after suffering falls in nursing homes. The article questions why so few of these deaths are fully investigated by the state, and how serious penalties for violations are rarely enforced.
There is a human side to the nonsense spewed by the insurance industry about malpractice. It's about needless suffering and tragedy. It is the face of many tragic cases that a billion dollar industry and its well funded lobby does not want the public to see.
I found an aticle online which gives insight into the lives of those affected by the most severe cases of negligent care. You can read the article online here.
I found an article online last week which reports that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has issued quality ratings for 15,800 nursing homes throughout the USA which participate in Medicare or Medicaid. Each nursing home was assigned a star rating, from one to five - with five being the best. The ratings are based on health inspection surveys, staffing information, and quality of care measures.
Alaska had the best record with 0.0% of all nursing homes have a 1-star ranking, and 26.7% of all nursing homes have a 5-star ranking. While Louisiana had the worst record with 39.3% of all nursing homes have a 1-star ranking, and 2.8% of all nursing homes have a 5-star ranking. New Jersey was in the middle of the pack with 22.2% of all nursing homes have a 1-star ranking, and 12.7% of all nursing homes have a 5-star ranking,
You can read the full article and the complete list of rankings by state online here.
I found an interesting article on NYDailyNews.com this week entitled, Hospital records were sometimes falsified to cover up medical mistakes. The article discusses the recent report that doctors, nurses and support staff at New York City-run hospitals have falsified documents in hospital records in order to cover up medical mistakes. The records were either deleted altogether or were doctored in order to omit specific details of certain cases in order to mislead investigators. The state issued 16 citations between 2004 and 2008.
You can read more on the story online here.
According to US News & World Report, In a typical year, about 3.2 million Americans will spend at least some time in a nursing home. To help find a good choice from among the nation's more than 15,500 homes, U.S. News created America's Best Nursing Homes - a list of the roughly 15,000 best nursing homes from throughout the country. You can search by name of the nursing home, by state, city or by zip code.
Once the search has been conducted, a report is generated with all of the homes which fit your search criteria. Each home is given an overall rating, a rating for health inspections, nursing staff and quality measures. The report also provides a link to a full, more detailed report of each home. You can access the search online here.
I have given a number of talks over the years about assisted living facilities and the dangers they pose to an unsuspecting public. My concern is based upon the fact that these organizations face much less regulatory control than long term care facilities and often are purely profit oriented. I have taken a number of depositions in cases surrounding what I consider to be questionable bonus structures - which focus on what is known as census (i.e. filling the beds) more than providing quality care.
This story involves allegations of evicting residents after bleeding their assets dry. If the allegations are true, it is reprehensible.
You can read the full story here (PDF)
After being bought out by private investors in 2002, along with 48 other nursing homes in Tampa, Florida, Habana Health Care Center began to suffer, and so did it's residents. Within the first few months the number of clinical nurses at the facility had been cut by half in an effort to cut costs by the facility's new management. And, according to Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration, budget cuts were made for nursing supplies, resident activities and other services.
Meanwhile, the investors and operators of the 49 homes throughout the state were making millions. As if that wasn't bad enough, over the three years of budget cuts, 15 Habana residents died from what their families feel was negligent care and since have filed suits in state court. In addition to a severely understaffed team of caregivers, reports found malfunctioning fire doors, unhygienic kitchens and a resident using a leg brace that was broken.
Due to the ever-increasing number of Americans needing elder care, nursing home facilities across the country are being bought out by large investors, who can only see dollar signs as our baby-boomers enter through their doors. The more people admitted to each facility should mean increased support and resources for the home. However, more and more this is not the case.
The severely neglected residents of these homes need more attention and care than ever. Federal and state regulators also said in interviews that budget cuts help explain why serious quality-of-care deficiencies — like moldy food and the restraining of residents for long periods or the administration of wrong medications — rose at every large nursing home chain after it was acquired by a private investment group from 2000 to 2006, even as citations declined at many other homes and chains.
While the suit is still in the beginning stages for the 15 families at Habana Health Care Center, similar cases continue to arise across the country. You can read more on the Habana and other facilities' stories in the New York Times article, At Many Homes, More Profit and Less Nursing.
The fourth annual Patient Safety in American Hospitals Study was released recently, and contains very insightful information for patients and their families when choosing a hospital. Safety in hospitals has recently become an overwhelming concern due to the rise of injuries suffered to patients during their hospital stays.
Often times this process can be quite daunting and somewhat confusing if you are not familiar with the all of the available resources provided to assist you. The study provides patient safety incident rates and associated mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, gives an overall patient safety indicator hospital performance assessment, and provides a list of the best-performing hospitals for overall patient safety across the country.
You can read the full April 2007 report here.